sott.net





Featured Book:

Political Ponerology


SOTT Focus Listing

· SOTT Focus articles listed by author




Latest Topics on the Signs Forum
· Psychonanalysis ...
[ nicklebleu ]
· Essoteric Christianity and Vegetarianism
[ quantu_look ]
· the incredible talking universe
[ JonnyRadar ]
· Evil Genes: Why Rome Fell, Hitler Rose, Enron Failed...
[ smsc ]
· B Y E - Better Your End
[ longtex ]
· USAF current email blackout from bases
[ OneSoul ]
· Spook psy-op Health Freedom USA promotes new pandemic scare
[ Rabelais ]
· Revisiting The Horrors Of The Holocaust
[ Laura ]

Firefox 3
This site best viewed
with Mozilla Firefox

SuperSearch Help

 

SOTT Focus

Joe Quinn
Signs of the Times
Wed, 01 Aug 2007 16:39 EDT

SOTT Focus

Cute, cuddly, harmless-looking, liberal Barack Obama. Now there's a guy to get the U.S. back on track! If he can just 'win' the primary (s)election process, and then the (s)election process after that, what's it called...oh yeah, the (p)residential (s)elections, he'll bring an end to the mindless massacring of innocent civilians for profit that has come to define the "war on terror", and the American people need never again be stirred out of their mind-numbing complacency by stories of small brown children being decapitated by a brave American teenager with a .50 caliber machine gun. I mean, Viet-nam and My Lai was containable, it was successfully pitched as an "American tragedy", but this Iraq business is getting out of hand! After all, the harsh realities of war 'over there' are meant to stay 'over there', not ooze out of the carefully manipulated American daily broadsheets and into the fragile mind of the average American.

So Obama's the man to fix it all, right? He'll stop the Republican rot! Or am I missing something?

Yeah, you guessed it, I'm missing something.

Obama: I would invade Pakistan over terror

Times online
Aug 01 2007

"Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama yesterday attempted to refute claims that he was soft on national security by promising he would send troops into Pakistan to hunt down terrorists - even without permission from that country's government.

[Remember the "without permission from that country's government" bit]

Standing in front of a Stars and Stripes flag, Mr Obama said: "There are terrorists holed up in those mountains who murdered 3,000 Americans. They are plotting to strike again... If we have actionable intelligence about high-value terrorist targets and President Musharraf won't act, we will."
The problem you see, and Obama knows it, is that being a 'liberal' just doesn't cut it anymore, in fact, it never did. Liberals are just not "presidential", and even Obama, the Muslim "son of a Kenya goat herder" (or not), knows that if you want to be the POTUS, you've gotta get your hands dirty, preferably with the blood of innocent people - especially if they're Pakistani Muslims.

Now, it may well be true that a significant majority of ordinary Americans have turned against the war in Iraq and are beginning to think that letting Bush send their wired, trigger-happy, hormone-laden-beef-fed "life's a first person shooter video game" teenage sons to liberate the oldest culture on earth, was perhaps not such a good idea, but Obama knows something that the American people don't: what the American people think and want just doesn't cut it anymore, it never did. In fact, the American people are kind of irrelevant, especially if you're trying to be next in line to the White House.

No indeed, forget about the plebs, the surest way to a fat chair in the Oval Office is to repeat, word for word, what the Neocons and their Zionist masters say, because they're the ones who define the nuances of U.S. foreign policy these days and whether a sovereign nation needs to be 'freedomified', or if a swift bunker buster enema would be more effective to eradicate the scourge of a few bearded jihadis who nevertheless threaten the lives of freedom-loving people everywhere and also "attacked us on 9/11".

So that's exactly what Obama did yesterday; he just said what arch Neoconservative Bill Kristol said two weeks ago:

Neocon Bill Kristol expects Bush to attack Pakistan

RawStory
July 12, 2007

A Fox host then cited a new report that "al Qaeda ... is running from Iraq, apparently to Pakistan" and asked "did this report come out on purpose so that we will have the right ... to go after Pakistan now?"

Kristol responded, "I think the president's going to have to take military action there over the next few weeks or months. ... Bush has to disrupt that sanctuary."

"I think, frankly, we won't even tell Musharraf," Kirstol continued. "We'll do what we have to do in Western Pakistan and Musharraf can say, 'Hey, they didn't tell me.'"

And what exactly is thing that Kristol and Obama feel that they have to do in Western Pakistan? According to Seth Jones, a South Asia specialist at the RAND Institute such an attack "would lead to major riots throughout Pakistan and the Arab world, and it would lead to certainly a major insurgency against US forces."

Now, call me a muck-raker if you like (just not 'the son of a Kenya goat-herder'), but isn't it a strange coincidence that Obama voiced more or less the exact same policy on Pakistan as "Bush adviser" and architect of the Iraq bloodbath, Bill Kristol did more than two weeks ago and that this policy simply serves the agenda of a certain illegal Middle Eastern statelet to create the 'justification' to wipe it's Arab enemies from the map? What does that tell us about where the real power lies in the U.S. today?

There are those who suggest that most U.S. politicians are entirely beholden to the Ziocons and their assorted Israel lobby groups because, at one time or another, they all have been photographed 'in flagrante' with anything from a 'Washington madam' to Republican Congressman Mark Foley. I tend to agree, not because I'm a cynic, but because it's very probably true.

Incidentally, Obama's speech, was allegedly:

"designed to shore up his credentials as a potential commander-in-chief by backing a pre-emptive military action which even President Bush has so far refused to order"

which is just more evidence that America really is totally and utterly screwed (to use the vernacular), because while the entire world hates Bush and his handlers and recognises them as the psychopathic child-killers that they are, the sadly accurate consensus in the clinically insane world of American politics is that the only way any potential 'selectees' like Obama or Hillary are gonna secure the Presidency after Bush's 8 years of bloodletting, is not to call for an end to war (as the American people want) but to upstage Bush in terms of murderous rampaging, and to do it according to the Ziocons' script. And it appears that the formerly liberal democrat Obama isn't about to shrink from the task.

Scared yet? You should be.

Discuss on SOTT Forum


Reader Comments
 
(Register to add your comments!)
 
Thank You, Joe By Lynne
Lynne

For putting this info out here, with explanations for any that might not be up to speed on what IS REALLY GOING ON IN AMERIKA.

The only people that are free in America are the psychopaths that rule it. And if you don't act like a psychopath, think like a psychopath and talk like a psychopath, ya ain't gonna get elected by the puppetmasters.


Added: Wed, 01 Aug 2007 19:18 EDT

Scary! By Aeneas

Thanks Joe for picking up on it and putting it out there for all to see.

Yes, there is no difference to what comes out of the mouthes of the different candidates.
I noticed that already on 29/6 did Obama say that he thought of possible missile strikes against Pakistan and Iran.
[Obama would consider missile strikes on Iran and Pakistan]


Added: Wed, 01 Aug 2007 20:45 EDT

Psychopaths By Robnitro

How can you compete with someone who has no doubt? How can you compete with someone who has no conscience?

I totally understand the problem that Lobaczewski shows in his book. Normal humans have no way they can individually compete with someone who plays their fears and hopes like a fiddle. We need to unite and learn the truth. The truth shall set you free!


Added: Wed, 01 Aug 2007 21:02 EDT

Congratulations Joe By Mallee
Mallee

The use of (s)elected is just brilliant. It so perfectly sums up the (s)election process by which the (s)electee gets to be (p)resident of that big place in Pennsylvania Ave for a while.


Added: Thu, 02 Aug 2007 00:42 EDT

Sad But True By Cyre2067
Cyre2067

thanks for pointing it out joe


Added: Thu, 02 Aug 2007 09:24 EDT

Shattering The Wall By Zadius sky
Zadius sky

Thanks Joe! People need to see the problems with the (s)elections.


Added: Thu, 02 Aug 2007 12:23 EDT

Well Put By Locksmith
Locksmith

Your assessment is right on target. This guy was chosen by the ultra-elite because he possesses "special" characteristics. And, he spent time at the UofC around the Straussians, so he fits right in with Kristol and ilk. In fact he is one of them.

Ah, the two-party one-party system that fools so many.

And, we have another gem of a senator here in Illinois. That's Dick Durbin, who was hand picked way back in the 1982 to replace Rep. Paul Findlay, who had been saying nice things about the Palestinians. Certain money groups mounted up behind Durbin and Findlay was ousted. Fast forward 25 years and Durbin is still around, only in the higher house and is majority "whip." How appropriate!

I'm not yet knowledgeable enough of Ponerology to make critical assessments. But, these two are a real pair that I believe personify the subject's central tenets.

Thanks for the work Joe.

Illinois is so blessed. But, so is most every other State in the USA.


Added: Thu, 02 Aug 2007 15:57 EDT

Deception By Zemolo
Zemolo

Talk about manipulation over manipulation here. Thanks Joe for this one!

Mmm... still cannot get what GWB is going to do after his 2nd term. Don't wanna go there!


Added: Thu, 02 Aug 2007 18:07 EDT

Nice One, Joe. By Adpop

I watched Obama on TV make his bold statements about launching pre-emptive war in Pakistani territory, which erased any doubt that he is a psycho, just like Hillary and most of the other candidates have already shown. That he also said he'd talk to Musharraf doesn't matter. Musharraf would be under siege by his own people if he let the US do this -- a nice pretext for an overt US takeover of Pakistan.


Added: Mon, 06 Aug 2007 17:15 EDT

But He'S A Minority!?! By Elrond21
Elrond21

yeah, and that's why i think mr. obama is particularly disturbing. Great article, kind of sums up why even though I am a black person and would love to see a black president...well everything going on these days kind of transcends all of that. Is the obama phenomenon too good to be true? Well, of course it is.


Added: Tue, 07 Aug 2007 14:20 EDT

I Knew Something Wasn'T Right.. By Ravengirl16
Ravengirl16

For a split second,I made the egregious error of thinking Barack Obama was actually a decent cantidate ,However I can see I was manipulated .I made the mistake of being hopeful ....he's just like the rest of them though.Thanks so much for the article.


Added: Fri, 10 Aug 2007 15:07 EDT


 

Donate to Signs

Donate once - or every month! Click here to learn how you can help!

Have a question or comment about the Signs page? Discuss it on the Signs of the Times news forum with the Signs Team.

Emails sent to Signs of the Times, Ark, Laura, or Cassiopaea become the property of Quantum Future Group, Inc and may be republished without notice.

Some icons appearing on this site were taken from KDE-look.org, Afterglow, Mayosoft, Everaldo, IconDrawer, VisualPharm, IconFactory, Klukeart, Icons-land, and TpdkDesign.net
.

Remember, we need your help to collect information on what is going on in your part of the world!
Send your article suggestions to: SOTT e-mail address


Original content copyright 2008 by Signs of the Times. See: Fair Use Policy

6,131 people have viewed this page since Wed, 01 Aug 2007

ATOM Feed   RSS

[Valid Atom 1.0]   [Valid RSS 2.0]