You've probably heard the story, or at least one like it. Husband kills wife and child, seemingly without remorse, then attempts to pass it off as a murder/suicide. And, remarkably, people believe him. The latest such example is Neil Entwistle, a British computer programmer, who murdered his American wife and 9-month-old daughter in 2006. He was recently sentenced to life in prison.
The trial made for a fascinating and disturbing spectacle. Aptly described by jurors as a complete narcissist, Entwistle put on quite the display during the presentation of a video of the bloody crime scene. But before we see his reaction for ourselves, let's see what the media tells us we see.
The Boston Globe tells us that Entwistle "breaks down" while watching video of his dead wife and daughter. In fact, the description deserves to be quoted in full:
Neil Entwistle's face turned scarlet red and he covered his mouth with his hand, looking down to avert his eyes from the video played today in court that showed the bodies of his wife and infant daughter, found shot to death in bed and frozen in an embrace.
Entwistle trembled and for the first time since his 2006 arrest began to cry publicly, tears running down the cheeks of his quivering jaw. As the 20-minute video played for the Middlesex Superior Court jury, he turned his eyes back at the screen and watched, his hand covering his gaping mouth.
The prosecution played the video taken by State Police investigators as part of the case against Entwistle, who is accused of killing his wife, Rachel, and 9-month-old daughter, Lillian, in Hopkinton on Jan. 20, 2006, then fleeing to his native England. Rachel Entwistle's family and spectators crowding the courtroom could not see the video screen, but it appeared to have a profound impact on the defendant and his family, who were seated on the opposite side of the room.
During the first five days of the trial, Neil Entwistle showed little emotion, smiling occasionally at his parents and younger brother, and bowing his head once during testimony about Lillian. During the video this morning, however, he sniffled and cried, averting his eyes to regain his composure and then looking back at the screen. The classical music the couple used to help Lillian sleep could be heard in the background, wafting from her nursery where it had been left playing.
Mother and daughter were found dead in bed two days after they were killed, tucked beneath a fluffy white comforter in the master bedroom, according to police testimony. Rachel Entwistle was wearing pajamas, lying on her left side, her feet curled up toward her body. Her right arm was across Lillian's chest and she faced her baby, who was flat on her back. Lillian's face had been covered by a pillow and her sleeper sack had been burned slightly by the gunshot in her upper left chest. Blood stained her onesie.
Yvonne Entwistle sat behind her son this morning and could not bear to watch the video, burying her head in her husband's shoulder.
Now, watch the video below for yourself. What do you see?
The authors of the above piece of fiction, Franci R. Ellement and Andrew Ryan, must be blind, stupid, or simply inhuman, because their observations do not correspond to reality. Let's take a closer look at what they say we see: "Entwistle trembled and ... began to cry publicly, tears running down the cheeks of his quivering jaw. [I]t appeared to have a profound impact on the defendant... [H]e sniffled and cried, averting his eyes to regain his composure and then looking back at the screen."
I have to say, to watch that video and to come away convinced that the scene "appeared to have a profound impact" on Entwistle smacks of supreme credulity. A more honest description would appear as follows: "Entwistle appeared to enjoy himself, using his hand to hide a large grin and occasional laughter. Every so often he appeared to attempt an unconvincing expression of emotion, forcing his eyes into a crude facsimile of sadness. His obvious smile and alert eye movements, however, betrayed his undisturbed composure and lack of guilt or despair."
Even some of the commentators on youtube were convinced by Entwistle's sorry attempt. One said:
He's not laughing for god's sake. Nor was he 'smirking' during the trial.While I don't doubt he committed the crimes, I don't think he can help how his face falls when crying. He had two sides to him, but one side deeply loved his family (makes no sense I know..). Showing him, in the cold light of day, what he has done to those two people he loved would of course cause him to break down. He has received just punishment - a life in a US prison at 29 years old - this is just.
Sadly, this person not only demonstrates their own astounding credulity, but their complete ignorance on the nature of human emotion and its absence in psychopaths. Paul Ekman is an expert on human emotion. He has researched the subject (specifically the facial expressions associated with emotion) for forty years and has written two particularly remarkable books, Emotions Revealed and Telling Lies.
As he shows in Emotions Revealed, the expressions of emotion like happiness and sadness are universal, that is, they are programmed in what Andrew Lobaczewski calls our "instinctive substratum", our phylogenetic makeup. So in a sense, the above youtube commentator is correct. Entwistle cannot control the fact that his face appears to be smiling, but he can attempt to hide it by covering his face and attempting to fake crying, which is what he is obviously doing. He is smiling, but it is NOT because that is just how he looks when he cries. It is because he is thoroughly enjoying himself. He is sadistic and he is a psychopath.
The more honest news reports make that strikingly obvious. While friends say the family gave every appearance of normality, "Entwistle lived a double life", as the Telegraph put it:
He was arrested at Royal Oak station on the London Underground on February 9. When a friend he was travelling with, Dash Munding, told him the police were on their way, Entwistle asked him: "Is there another way off this platform?" or words to that effect, said Mr Fabbri.
Police found he was carrying a page of escort agency adverts torn from a local newspaper as well as a notepad. On one page he had written of his deep love for his family, on another he had scribbled down a plan to sell his story to the "highest bidder".
A month before his family was murdered, Entwistle, 29, was also trawling local escort agency websites and contacting women on a website named Adult Friend Finder looking for "discreet" sex, the prosecution said.
He was also searching the internet for information on bankrupty, "killing and suicide", the court heard.
In other words, a bankrupt Entwistle planned the whole thing in cold blood. First he did a little reading on "murder/suicides" for a plausible story. Then he shot his daughter, Lillian, who was being cradled on the bed by her mother, Rachel. The bullet left the infant's abdomen and entered her mother's breast. Entwistle then shot his wife, Rachel, in the forehead. And in the time before and after, he was shopping for "discrete" prostitutes and planning on making a buck on his story. Everything about this creature screams psychopath, and yet the only media representative to even come close to the truth is Fox News' Keith Ablow. Even then, his analysis leaves much to be desired. He ends his piece with the following nonsense:
Men like Entwistle ... feel like stripping their masks away is tantamount to killing them, because they believe those thin, synthetic disguises are all that keep them from dissolving into nothingness and feeling the full weight of unspeakable emotional turmoil, with roots that always reach deep into their pasts.
Sorry Keith, but you need to reread Cleckley. There's no fear of unspeakable emotional turmoil lying behind that mask of sanity. Psychopaths do not even know the meaning of those words. They hang on to their masks with such conviction because they are predators, and without them, they cannot survive. As Lobaczewski wrote to Laura Knight-Jadczyk:
Their furies are to be understood as the symptomatical responses. For them you are the worst enemy. You are hurting them very painfully. For a psychopath, revealing his real condition, tearing down his Cleckley-mask, brings the end of his self-admiration. You are threatening them with the destruction of their secret world, and bring to null their dreams of ruling and introducing their best social system possible. When his real condition is publicly revealed, a psychopath feels like a wounded animal. In such conditions, suicidal thoughts are common among them.
To defend themselves they are using all the possibilities that nature endowed them with. The unusual creativity of suggestive innuendos, new catchwords and so on, they employ as their typical way. (Look page 167). Therefore, such aggression could be readily foreseen! And so you have an opportunity to study this phenomenon of psychopathic nature.
To let down that facade would reveal that they are little more than unfeeling intraspecies predators that feed off the pain and suffering of others and thus destroy their chances of feeding. Even a psychopath is aware of the consequences of such a revelation. His "dreams" of a boot forever stomping on the face of humanity are crushed.
When I read comments like Ablow's and the youtube commentator's, comments so steeped in ignorance and projection, I get in a bit of a funk. After all, if only people would first accept the existence of psychopathy, we would not be so likely to fall for their cheap "emotional" manipulations. You see, psychopaths are wired differently than normal humans. They do not feel close to others, they do not feel remorse, they do not feel others' pain, they are completely egocentric, and they derive a pathological "joy" from others' suffering.
If only people would realize this, they would not become our leaders. But instead, we have shells of human beings like George W. Bush -- a "man" who is so emotionally and intellectually deficient that he doesn't even pretend to feel normal human emotion -- and Dick Cheney -- a "man" whose contempt for us "others" is so apparent in his frequent contemptuous scowls -- determining the future of our planet. We have psychopaths in the military sadistically murdering and torturing innocent Iraqis. Indeed, we have psychopaths directing the army of the world's greatest superpower. And it has left more than one million innocent people dead.
Neil Entwistle's sick display of joy at the sight of his dead wife and daughter, and his transparent attempt to feign sadness should be apparent to every normal, rational human being. Unfortunately it is not, and we all suffer as a result, and we will continue to suffer, and millions more will die, until we decide to grow up and accept the most pressing truth about our reality. What is that truth? That not only do psychopaths live among us, but through our ignorance we have allowed them to rise to positions of almost absolute power over us. Widespread knowledge of the reality of psychopathy on this planet is the essential first step to securing our future and that of our children. Make it your priority to spread the word.
The best moment was at 6:12, were he forgot to cover his face. You can also see were his face gets red and then normal again. This is because he had to suppress laughing out loud.
Why was he so pre-occupied covering his mouth, rather than his eyes as a knee-jerk reaction of those experiencing Genuine emotion, yet programmed throughout life to Supress It!?!
He is cracking up and having a hard time covering up with faux grief. I am blown away that those reporters saw that as grief - holy friggin moly. Also the hand covering the mouth is a clue. I just read a good book "How to read a person like a book" and the author(s) state that covering your mouth with your hand is a sign of lying.
Covering one's mouth with one's hand can have different interpretations. Some people being shocked by something also cover their mouths with their hands - witness the many people who covered their mouths with their hands as they watched the planes hit the towers and then watched the towers collapse.
At one point and time you see his teeth, i tried to make the face he was making and be "sobbing" there is NO WAY! It is almost impossible for him to be showing his teeth like that unless he was cracking up.
Stopped watching after 30 seconds. It's curious because I don't assume he was laughing. No. What I saw was a man laughing and covering up his mouth. His hand left his mout for a few seconds and then you saw his he was in a laughing stupor. He couldn't stop himself from laughing! That's what I SAW! Not assumptions, no psychological theories. He laughed. I saw.
That's something I thought about too. I wouldn't be able to look at all. Just couldn't. If I was asked to look at the scene where my loved ones died, I would probably pass out from the grief and stress. I would need tranquilizers and probably months to recover. I just can't grok this guy.
Laughing and crying are separated only by a hair's breadth - they are almost identical. Some people cry with laughter, some people laugh when they cry. Both phenomena have the same triggers in the brain and involve the same muscles in the face and chest.
Vierotchka, you really need to read Paul Ekman's books that I referenced. Joy and sadness are NOT almost identical, nor are their expressions. What you are describing is a blend of sadness and joy. You're falling into the very false arguments as the youtube user I quoted in the article. I'll repeat myself. Emotional expressions are UNIVERSAL. They are not relative to individuals. Yes, some individuals experience sadness with joy, but there is not a normal person on the planet that experiences the kind of laughter Entwistle shows at the sight of his dead and bloody mother and infant child. That is COMPLETELY different than either nervous laughter or joy blended with sadness.
In fact, he could be having what is known as a bout of nervous laughter triggered by grief and shock at what he is seeing. I have several friends who react this way when under great stress and shock - it comes off as inappropriate laughter when they are in fact crying. Some people can't help it, they laugh when they learn of the death of a loved one, for example.
I am not implying that Entwistle is innocent, nor that he is guilty, I am just pointing out the fact that this video doesn't prove anything, that he could be having a nervous laugh reaction, that he might be passing from laughter to crying to laughter as a nervous reaction to stress and a strong emotion.
I have a friend who, when we reported to the police that her husband had been sexually abusing their 3 year-old daughter, she was laughing even though she was in grief and shock. She couldn't help it, and was deeply distressed.
Sorry about the double post above, I inadvertently clicked on "add reply".
You write: "a bout of nervous laughter triggered by grief and shock at what he is seeing"
Wait a minnit here! NERVOUS LAUGHTER triggered by grief and shock???
We are talking about the deaths of his wife and child. What kind of monster would have a "bout of nervous laughter" in such a situation? We are talking about the most major, horrifying, shocking, mind-shattering thing possible. "Nervous laughter"???!!!
There is no way of telling from a small and low quality video whether there was any moisture in the man's eyes or not. People are seeing what they want to see, I am simply being neutral and fair. The way his brows furrow indicate grief - laughter and grinning don't produce this on the brows. Furthermore, I have not seen anywhere that Neil Entwistle was put through Dr. Robert Hare's Psychopathy Checklist, so there is no way you or I can state with any kind of authority that Entwistle is a psychopath or not. There are other mental conditions and dysfunctions which can lead a man to kill wife and child besides psychopathy. It is both dangerous and abusive to jump to hasty conclusions and posit a diagnosis, especially if one is not really qualified to do so.
What I am describing is the nervous reactions triggered by great distress, which translate into laughter when crying should be the response. The video doesn't necessarily show laughter and grinning, it could just as well show grief and crying. Have you met Mr Entwistle? Did you put him through Dr. Hare's tests? There are a number of different mental conditions which can push a man to kill wife and children besides psychopathy. I just refuse to jump to hasty conclusions to satisfy some personal agenda or other.
About twelve years ago, the husband of a friend of mine went missing. We searched for him for two days, and finally found him in a small forest, dead - he had hung himself. My friend went into shock and laughed in the exact same manner as is interpreted in this video. Her reaction was nervous, she was in deep pain and distress. So this is why I refuse to jump to hasty conclusions based on a six-minute low quality video on YouTube.
The guy is ecstatic with joy, it is easily seen in his eyes, especially around 3:25. Exaggerated facial expression cannot hide the expression in his eyes.
More over as from 5:40 culminating at 5:57 we can see genuine content smirk on his face which is far cry from Ms. Vierotchka's diagnosis of nervous laughter. Nervous laughter comes from the throat in spasm like waves and instead of relaxing effect which is the case here it rather has tightening effect and increases tension and anxiety.
You can observe this again from 6:16 to 6:30.
Scary indeed
Any woman, man or child, after five minutes of crying needs a tissue to wipe the tears and the nose ... I didn't see any tissues or snot bubbles. He thrived on the publicity. With approximately 80% of inmates being psychopaths, Entwistle will live out his days with all the other psychopaths planning, plotting and scheming against each other ... because in max lockdown that's all they can do .... all that 'time' on their hands. I wonder how long that pretty boy face will last!
I clicked right over to the video, not knowing what to expect. The first words out of my mouth (and I was so shocked I couldn't help but say it out loud) were, "The guy is freakin' laughing!" I think if you showed anyone that video without telling them what it is, they would conclude that this guy is at a comedy club or something.
The most shocking thing is how common psychopaths are. Even though they don't represent anything close to a majority of the population, the damage they can do is phenomenal. That is pretty much 100% due to the fact that most of us simply refuse to recognize their existence.
What I find almost more shocking than Entwistle's obvious laughter (after about 2 minutes I wanted to turn it off) was that it could somehow be interpreted as crying by JOURNALISTS of all people, who have a self-professed duty to inform the public of the facts of the matter!!! And people look to these publications for their information! By this article alone, SOTT shows it has more integrity and objectivity than "The Boston Globe" does. And it's done on a budget far smaller than the "Globe". When are people going to start demanding accountability from the media for such shoddy reporting?!?
What I find more shocking than Entwistle's possible laughter or possible crying is the total lack of emotion of his mother at the sight of her daughter-in-law and grand-daughter's mutilated corpses.
INSIDE EDITION spoke to body language expert Janine Driver about Entwistle's perplexing reaction.
"He's leaking how he is really feeling about what he is seeing...If it were just for a couple of minutes I would say it is possible he could be nervous. This is not sadness. A big smile on our face and the crow's-feet around our eyes, you don't have to be a body language expert to see this to know that this is not sadness. This is not grief," Driver said.
The grimace of pain and grief can be very close to the grimace of joy, and both produce crow's feet around the eyse - except that your "expert" didn't note that the furrow of his brow expresses grief - when smiling or grinning, the brow doesn't furrow.
Seeing is believing. If one were watching the horrific scenes being flashed in the courtroom, then one that experiences true emotion might be able to project normal grief, horror and shock onto this human looking predator--but simply observing this psychopath as he laughs and is amused by the most gruesome of acts imaginable--leaves one almost speechless.
Now, imagine Bush and Cheney's similar reactions to the millions of deaths and untold suffering that they have caused and you are approaching objective reality!
I had to stop viewing the video. I'm not a violent person but I felt a moment that he deserved a punch in the face to wipe that smile off his face. It's so obvious that he is faking it, I can't but help cringe at the explanations people make. That's like people who ascribe human qualities to animals, when they don't think like humans do.
If any normal person was in that situation they would have gone through a box of tissues in that seven minutes! It's obvious that whatever he was feeling was not of feeling of loss and sadness! I saw no tears running down that man's cheeks. A definite psychopath if I I ever saw any.
Only highly emotional people with no self-control would have gone through a box of tissues in those seven minutes. Stoics would show no emotion yet be seething inside.
Vietotchka, this is a lie - pure and simple. Either you have no idea what it is like to have human emotions - or you are working VERY hard to take the heat off Entwistle - either way your agenda is showing in a BIG way.
You are making comments as if they are facts - they are not - you are twisting and lying and manipulating to try to convince readers that this monster is a man. Only one reason anyone would try to do that - and it's not to get at the truth.
I couldn't watch it all. The impression I got from his reaction was actually "excitement". He was thrilled; the adrenaline was pumping, and he couldn't do anything about it.
You are defending the indefensible! You could put a spin on the Abu Graib pictures depicting naked Iraqi's in a pyramid being presided over by a smiling, smoking female prison guard/soldier as nothing more than willing Iraqi prisoners engaging in harmless banter, while guarded by a terrified female officer. V, I respect your right to your opinion, but you are trying much too hard to defend your position, perhaps you could be CO-INTEL!
Vierotchka seems to be lacking any understanding whatsoever of normal human emotions - perhaps that is why she/he is fighting so hard to defend the 'normalcy' of a psychopath. No amount of explaining or pronouncements on Vierotchka's part can hide her/his lack of emotional affect - chilling indeed.
To compare a wife finding a husband after a suicide to a man who butchered his wife and children evidences a severe lack of grasp of the crux of the situation - perhaps Vierotchka is simply defending her/his own?
I'm sure she/he will now strike out at me for pointing out the very obvious - but - again - no amount of words can hide the lack of emotions/emotional understanding behind her/his posts.