The article below was posted by me on OpEdNews sometime ago, but it is worth a review, I believe, ever since the news about McCain's membership and name on the letterhead of an extreme right-wing organization with fascist leanings. That plus his close association with 'W', whose family is involved in the fascist movement. The article below was titled: Onward, Christian Soldiers.

One of the advantages, or disadvantages, of living a good long life, is that one remembers so many events on the world stage. For example, I remember my mother coming into my bedroom and telling me that the Japanese had attacked Pearl Harbor. I was just eleven, by two days, and hadn't a clue as to where Pearl Harbor was or why she was so upset. But I remember the incident vividly. I remember the end of the war and the pictures of the horribly emaciated bodies of the living and the dead from the German concentration camps. Those pictures changed my life forever. I remember being so very proud of my country during the Nuremberg Trials - that we as a country stood for law and order, and compassion, good government, and all of the good things in the world. I remember reading a comment from the wife of one of the generals who tried to assassinate Hitler, "My family could have stopped that awful little man, but we didn't want to become involved."

Imagine my horror when I read, just a few years later that between 1948 and 1952, America's Displaced Persons Commission arranged for nearly a half-million Europeans to immigrate to the United States. For two years, it barred those who had been members of organizations sympathetic or collaborative to the Nazis. In 1950 that began to change, when first the 'Baltic Legion' was removed from the list of 'hostile' movements, though the Baltic Legion was also known as the Baltic Waffen SS." (Rigorous Intuition, March 31, 2006)

The article from Rigorous Intuition goes on to explain that, "The change of policy was strategic: The CIA was subsidizing the immigration of European Nazis and fascists in order to build a far-right power bloc as a hedge against communism. Its primary vehicle became the Republican Party." The Republican Party organized a subsidiary group called the Republican Heritage Groups Council in 1969. It is interesting to Google the organization for further information. There is more there than can possibly be in an article of this length.

One of the sites that came up in the Google search is 'nazigop', and an article by Carla Binion, 2000, "Nazis and the Republican Party." In this article Binion quotes extensively from Russ Bellant's book, Old Nazis, The New Right, and The Republican Party, which I had read years ago, since loaned out, and lost track of. It was published in about 1988. Bellant had been intrigued by an article in the Washington Jewish Week stating the George H. W. Bush had some six former Nazi and fascist sympathizers on his campaign committee. Bellant's investigative reporting as detailed in his book indicated that these people were:

1. Rudi Slavoff, GOP Heritage Council's executive director, and head of "Bulgarians for Bush." Slavoff was a member of a Bulgarian fascist group, and he put together an event in Washington honoring Holocaust denier, Austin App.

2. Florian Galdau, director of GOP outreach efforts among Romanians, and head of "Romanians for Bush." Galdau was once an Iron Guard recruiter, and he defended convicted Nazi war criminal Valerian Trifa.

3. Nicholas Nazarenko, leader of a Cossack GOP ethnic unit. Nazarenko was an ex-Waffen SS officer.

4. Method Balco, GOP activist. Balco organized yearly memorials for a Nazi puppet regime.

5. Walter Melianovich, head of the GOP's Byelorussian unit. Melianovich worked closely with many Nazi groups.

6. Bohdan Fedorak, leader of "Ukranians for Bush." Fedorak headed a Nazi group involved in anti-Jewish wartime pogroms.

And last, but definitely not least, Laszlo Pasztor, a convicted Nazi war collaborator, built the Republican émigré network. Pasztor, who served as adviser to Republican Paul Weyrich, belonged to the Hungarian Arrow Cross, a group that helped liquidate Hungary's Jews. Pasztor was founding chairman of the Republican Heritage Groups Council.

In an article printed in the San Francisco Sunday Examiner and Chronicle, October 30, 1988, Warren Hinkle wrote, "We're not talking here about some guys wearing swastika earrings. One of the Bush backers was a former police chief in Latvia during WWII who rounded up the residents of a Jewish town and burned it to the ground. Another was a former SS appointed mayor during a 1941 pogrom in which thousands of Jews were murdered."

"All of these Nazi swingers came to the United States as refugees with the help of the CIA in the late 1940's. Bellant's report was backed up by the Washington newspaper Jewish Week, which printed an article revealing the Nazi-collaborationist and fascist background of the six - the majority of whom remain Republican Party wheels."

Also, and this is from a book review located on Buzzflash.com, The American Axis: Henry Ford, Charles Lindbergh, and the Rise of the Third Reich, Max Wallace, "Given a BBC report in late July of 2007 that covers a planned and corroborated - but fortunately never carried out - right wing conspiracy (that involved George Bush's grandfather, Prescott, as one of those involved) to overthrow FDR and install a government in the style of Hitler and Mussolini (we are not making this up), 'The Axis' takes on new importance." The final sentence of the review has a chilling quote from Charles Lindbergh who was lamenting the destruction of Germany, a civilization that "was basically our own, stemming from the same Christian beliefs."

And then there was the personal incident I was involved in during a George W. Bush campaign swing through the city that is also the county seat. At the time I was an elected county official (since retired). So, I went to the train station to see if I could tell if George was as bad as people said. Of course the train was late, and a group of us Democrats eventually coalesced, since this is a small county (population), and we all knew each other. Sitting near us was an obvious Bush supporter - a woman with cute tightly curled white hair, the ubiquitous straw hat with the red, white and blue ribbon, a blouse with red, white and blue motif, white skirt - the whole nine yards of fun patriotism. After a time, an intern reporter for the local paper came up to interview us as to why we were there, since we were Democrats. The woman heard us, and called me over to her. She asked if I were a Democrat, and I answered in the affirmative. Her next comment really jolted me. "You'd better be glad I don't have a gun because if I did, I'd shoot you." Having someone threaten to shoot you, eye to eye, tends to focus one's attention. In this case, on the radical Republican right.

So - what does all of this have to do with the breakdown of our current Federal Administration, or G. W. Bush, Dick Cheney, and Alberto Gonzales, Karl Rove, et al? Simply that we have George W. Bush's father and grandfather enamored of a fascist style of government. As an old saying goes, "The apple does not fall far from the tree." Which brings us up to current times.

The night of 9/11, my husband and I were watching CNN. We heard Wolf Blitzer state, unequivocally, that the attacks had been generated from Iraq. We turned to ABC and Peter Jennings, who kept stating that it was unknown who was behind the attacks.

Over time, with all of the propaganda coming from Washington and the captive media, and with the passage of the Authorization for the Use of Military Force in September, 2001 and the Patriot Act in October, 2001, I could only be reminded that Hitler came to power because of a supposed attack on the German government building, the Reichstag. It seemed to me that these two documents had been written long before 9/11 and were simply waiting for an occasion to be rushed through. As stated in Elliot D. Cohen's: This Summer, Will America Officially Become A Totalitarian State?, "The September 11 attacks were foreshadowed by the Project for the New American Century (PNAC) in its report on Rebuilding American Defenses (2000) when it stated, '...the process of transformation, even if it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event - like a new Pearl Harbor...'. This would not be significant were it not for the fact that the Vice President, among other key members of the Bush Administration, were founding members of PNAC."

Also, I truly wanted George W. Bush, or as I shall refer to him from this point on, W., to succeed as President. I recognized that we were in a delicate situation after the attacks. But as time went by and all we got were photo ops such as Mission Accomplished, I recognized that he was succeeding, but I wasn't sure at what.

When I realized that W. had decided that he alone, without Congress, could suspend the Constitution and declare martial law, I became really concerned. As described by Elliot D. Cohen:

"Clearly, the invasion of Iraq was never conceived as a means of stopping Saddam Hussein from instigating terrorism. This was made plain in the official British document known as the Downing Street memos, which said that Bush was attempting to make the facts 'fit' the policy in order to justify invading Iraq, since Hussein's WMD capability was in fact 'less than that of Libya, North Korea or Iran'.

...Add to these facts that the Bush administration has displayed consistent disregard for the rule of law by canceling habeas corpus, disregarding the Geneva Conventions in the torture of prisoners of war, using signing statements to override congressional lawmaking authority, eavesdropping on Americans without court warrants, summarily refusing to comply with Congressional subpoenas, firing federal prosecutors for political reasons, outing a covert CIA agent, threatening to jail journalists for disclosing leaked government documents, censoring mainstream media and infusing it with government propaganda ('prepackaged news' staged by PR firms working for the government), placing 'gatekeepers' in all federal agencies who report directly to the White House, eliminating legal protections for government whistle blowers, arresting peaceful protestors, manipulating the terror alert system to instill fear in Americans, and stacking the Supreme Court."

Then on July 28, 2007, Dave Lindorff posted an article on Buzzflash.com, "Martial Law Threat is Real." In this article Lindorff states, "The first step, or course, was the first Authorization for Use of Military Force passed in September 2001, which the president has subsequently used to claim - improperly, but so what - that the whole world, including the U.S., is a battlefield in a so-called 'War' on Terror, and that he has extra-Constitutional unitary executive powers to ignore laws passed by Congress. As constitutional scholar and former Reagan-era associate deputy attorney general Bruce Fein observes, that one claim, that the U.S. is itself a battlefield, is enough to allow this or some future president to declare martial law, 'since you can always declare martial law on a battlefield.' All he'd need would be a pretext, like another terrorist attack inside the U.S." The 2001 Authorization for Use of Military Force was followed by the Patriot Act, passed in October, 2001, which undermined much of the Bill of Rights.

Lindorff cites some other documented actions against the citizens of this country taken by this administration, including the following, "Put together with the wholly secret construction now under way - courtesy of a $385 million grant by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers to Halliburton subsidiary KBR, Inc - of detention camps reportedly capable of confining as many as 400,000 people, and a recent report that the Pentagon has a document, dated June 1, 2007, classified Top Secret, which declares there to be a developing 'insurgency' within the U.S. and which lays out a whole martial law counterinsurgency campaign against legal dissent, and you have all the ingredients for a military takeover of the United States."

Lindorff concludes with the comment, "If ordered to turn their guns and bayonets on their fellow Americans, would our 'heroes' in uniform follow their consciences, and their oaths to 'uphold and defend' the Constitution of the United States?....If we are headed for martial law, better that it be with a broken military. Maybe if it's broken badly enough, the administration will be afraid to test the idea."

I disagree with Lindorff on that conclusion. And the reason is, Blackwater: The Rise of The World's Most Powerful Mercenary Army, by Jeremy Scahill. The following quote is from the flyleaf for the book, which book I have read, and the quote is apparently accurate because all of the assertions in the book are documented:

"Meet Blackwater USA, the powerful private army that the U.S. government has quietly hired to operate in international war zones and on American soil. Its contacts run from deep inside the military and intelligence agencies to the upper echelons of the White House. Blackwater is the elite Praetorian Guard for the 'global war on terror,' with its own military base, a fleet of twenty aircraft, and twenty thousand troops at the ready. Run by a multimillionaire Christian conservative who bankrolls President Bush and his allies, its forces are capable of overthrowing governments, yet most people have never heard of Blackwater."

After reading the book, my opinion is that Erik Prince, the 'CEO' of Blackwater USA, a conservative Catholic, believes wholeheartedly that the capitalist system is Christ's own. In short, he is a 'true believer', and to paraphrase Hawkeye from M*A*S*H, this is NOT the 'finest kind'. Christian fundamentalism is no better or worse than fundamentalism of any religion, or lack thereof. It is a blind adherence to someone else's interpretation of that religion, and usually that someone else has something other than God in mind. One of the most distressing points about Blackwater USA is that it does not adhere to the Uniform Code of Military Justice. It operates under orders from Bush, Cheney, the military or whomever. Just as the Waffen SS operated under Himmler.

On July 17, 2007, OpEdNews posted from the Office of the President of the United States an Executive Order: Blocking Property of Certain Persons Who Threaten Stabilization Efforts in Iraq. This block will not be determined by the courts or law enforcement, but by the Secretaries of the Treasury, State, and Defense. Basically what this Executive Order does is threaten the economic foundation of any individual who protests in an anti-war demonstration, or who donates to an anti-war campaign. It is two pages in length, but well worth the reading. Also posted on Truthout.com on Friday, August 3, 2007 was a report from Reuters, Matt Spetalnick, that W, "ordered on Thursday a freeze on the U.S. assets of anyone Washington deems to be undermining Lebanon's pro-Western government." These two Executive Orders are in violation of the Fourth Amendment to the Bill of Rights,

"Right of search and seizure regulated. The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized."

How chilling can this be on dissent? How willing will people be to jeopardize their assets, and their children's assets?

Which brings me to my final conclusion. Posted on Truthout.com on Friday, August 3, 2007 is "Report Details Evangelism at Highest Levels of US Military", Jason Leopold.

"A report released publicly on Thursday by the Defense Department's (DOD) inspector general has found high-ranking Army and Air Force personnel violated long-standing military regulations when they participated in a promotional video for an evangelical Christian organization while in uniform and on active duty." ...The 47-page report was also highly critical of Pentagon chaplain Col. Ralph G. Benson, ....In fact, the report says, Benson was determined to use the video to 'attract new supporters' to the Christian Embassy, an evangelical organization that evangelizes members of the military and politicians in Washington, DC via daily Bible studies and outreach events. The group holds prayer breakfasts on Wednesdays in the Pentagon's executive dining room, according to the organization's web site. Bill Bright, the founder of Campus Crusade for Christ, founded the Christian Embassy 30 years ago."

How did I get from fascism to Christian fundamentalism? By way of the book, American Fascists: The Christian Right and the War on America, Chris Hedges.

I had come to the same conclusions in my thinking as Chris Hedges in this book, but Hedges documented all of his assertions. The quote from the back cover of his book states very succinctly what I have been trying to put together here,

"Dr. James Luther Adams, my ethics professor at Harvard Divinity School, told us that when we were his age - he was then close to 80 - we would all be fighting the 'Christian fascists'."

"The warning, given to me nearly 25 years ago, came at the moment Pat Robertson and other radio and televangelists began speaking about a new political religion that would direct is efforts at taking control of all institutions, including mainstream denominations and the government. Its stated goal was to use the United States to create a global Christian empire. It was hard, at the time, to take such fantastic rhetoric seriously, especially given the buffoonish quality of leaders in the Christian Right who expounded it. But Adams warned us against the blindness caused by intellectual snobbery. The Nazis, he said were not going to return with swastikas and brown shirts. Their ideological inheritors in America had found a mask for fascism in patriotism and the pages of the Bible."